GOOD FRIDAY, Year C: April 2 2010

Preacher: Fr Christopher Woods

Introduction

One of the most profound subtexts and themes, which runs through both the gospel texts and the experience of the Christian life, is that of nakedness and vulnerability.

We are rarely comfortable with ourselves, with our own nakedness, never mind our nakedness in the public sphere; it's more easily avoided or not talked about, but sadly, because of this, we can easily fall into dysmorphia. And that is true whether we talk about physical nakedness or emotional/spiritual nakedness.

So much for our own insecurity which stretches beyond the physical. In fact, insecurity is rarely about physicality at all. But what happens in physical terms is extremely connected to our emotional, psychological and spiritual wellbeing. They cannot be divorced.

When we talk of emotional/spiritual nakedness, we are of course talking about our vulnerability, our exposure to effectual change and about baring our souls and true selves to both criticism/rejection and love/acceptance in the face of others. More than that, of course, it's about being exposed to criticism and love/acceptance in the face of ourselves, in the mirror. My biggest critic is not my enemy or my friend, or God, but myself. One of the biggest difficulties of the contemporary person is bitterly excessive self-loathing or self-criticism, which of course is projected onto others and onto God. If I cannot look at myself as I am, then how can someone else accept me or how can God accept me? And then finally it's about being exposed to the judgement and love/acceptance in the face of the crucified Christ on this Good Friday. Of course the difference between God and everyone else is that with God there is no danger of rejection or criticism. There is loving judgement, a refining acceptance, because none of us has the purity and intensity of love which is God. That is profoundly central to the mystery of the Cross and it is what I shall explore in this portion of time when we contemplate the death of Christ who was naked, alone and abandoned on the Tree of Life.

Address 1 — Reading: Mark 14:43–52

Immediately, while He was still speaking, Judas, one of the twelve, arrived; and with him there was a crowd with swords and clubs, from the chief priests, the scribes, and the elders. Now the betrayer had given them a sign, saying, 'The one I will kiss is the man; arrest Him and lead Him away under guard.' So when he came, he went up to Him at once and said, 'Rabbi!' and kissed Him. Then they laid hands on Him and arrested Him. But one of those who stood near drew his sword and struck the slave of the high priest, cutting off his ear. Then Jesus said to them, 'Have you come out with swords and clubs to arrest me as though I were a bandit? Day after day I was with you in the temple teaching, and you did not arrest me. But let the scriptures be fulfilled.' All of them deserted Him and fled.

A certain young man was following Him, wearing nothing but a linen cloth. They caught hold of him, but he left the linen cloth and ran off naked.

Where are we as Jesus is betrayed and arrested? From which angle do we experience Jesus' agonising trial? Are we amongst the soldiers armed with clubs and swords? Perhaps we are behind the soldiers, in the stampede of a crowd which follows under the light of the paschal moon through the damp thickets of the Garden of Gethsemane, trying desperately to see a glimpse of the action. Perhaps we are standing scared with the disciples huddling behind a tree trying not to be seen?

Or are we with the young man who is wearing nothing but the linen cloth, and then, in a fearful stupor, we run away naked?

Jewish culture abhorred nakedness. It was humiliating and much too pagan. So the presence of a naked young man is unusual and forces questions to be asked. This young man 'in the prime of his life' as the Greek suggests, who somehow for some reason in a state of panic or in a flurry of military struggle, has his linen garment torn off and runs away into the distance, closely following all the other disciples who fled, who left Jesus alone with the soldiers.

I do hazard a guess that we might identify with this young man? At least if we don't identify directly with him, then surely we wonder at his identity or the significance of his presence? Was he a follower of Christ?

Another disciple (some say St Mark) or a stranger? We're not sure. Perhaps we, like him, want to run away from the vulnerable Jesus, because it forces us to examine our own nakedness and vulnerability? We are used to the controlled Jesus, the One who is masterful and authoritative and who teaches us and who is glorious and strong. The naked man runs away not necessarily from the soldiers and the batons and the clubs and swords, I would suggest, but rather from the sight of the betrayed Jesus, fearful that he might be identified with this powerless rabbi, in whose words and actions so many people had placed their reliance. Perhaps the young man is unable to confront his own vulnerability?

In our liturgy of the Last Supper last night, I suggested that we are called by Jesus, somehow, to allow ourselves to become spiritually naked, to become vulnerable and become comfortable in that nakedness and vulnerability and to set aside our fear of rejection and our pride. By embodying the nakedness which the Jewish culture so fiercely abhorred, Jesus once again turns this cultural prejudice on its head and allows nakedness to become a thing of beauty and of potential strength. Just as Jesus got down on His hands and knees to wash the feet of His disciples, so are we called both to get down and get dirty for the sake of love, but also in that same servant vulnerability, simultaneously allow ourselves to be loved in our nakedness and vulnerability. To love and to be loved. It's harder to feel accepted and loved than it often is to love other people. Yet how can we love others if we do not love ourselves?

So now, as Jesus is being bound and pulled and thrown about and chained and cuffed and punched, what are we doing? Where is this naked young man taking us?

In the struggle and panic of life with its pressures, busy-ness and complications, joys and sorrows, we are occasionally, perhaps not often, but occasionally, forced to face up to our own true selves. The protection and mask of the outer clothing has to come off. Either because someone who knows us almost better than we know ourselves realises what's going on in our mind, or perhaps the vibe we give to others is all too overwhelming to avoid. Perhaps we crack under the pressure of hiding away? Perhaps we cannot keep on the linen garment of our veneer any longer, and in the squabble and struggle of daily life our layers get torn off and we have nowhere to go, so we try to run away, naked, vulnerable, scared, sobbing, trying to escape from the centre and source of love, not realising that we are in fact running away from love, rather than towards it?

The truth of the matter is that the disciples, like this solitary young man who loses his linen garment, have nowhere to go. We have nowhere to go. We think we can hide from God, but we can't. We run fast and we run far, but we cannot hide. We might think Jesus is going in the other direction, but of course we are just fooling ourselves. In our naked vulnerability, we cannot hide.

Some words from Psalm 139 (vv7–10) ring loudly in our ears, at this point, do they not?

Where can I go from your Spirit?
Where can I flee from your presence?
If I go up to the heavens, you are there;
if I make my bed in the depths, you are there.
If I rise on the wings of the dawn,
if I settle on the far side of the sea,
even there your hand will guide me,
your right hand will hold me fast.

If you feel that you are running fast and running far and in your nakedness and vulnerability and the thickets of the world's distractions, you cannot see where you are going, then let's imagine what happened next to that young man who left his clothes behind. What do you think happened to him? Did he fall, graze his naked body and become bruised and sore? Or did he stop and think that he was foolish to think that he could get away? Perhaps he stopped, turned and went back and followed Jesus, the soldiers and the crowds and Peter, to the Sanhedrin.

We don't have to run any more. Yes, we may be afraid, but after all, it is not us whom the soldiers want. It's Jesus who has been arrested — He is the One they want.

Address 2 — Reading: Matthew 27:27–31

Then the soldiers of the governor took Jesus into the governor's headquarters, and they gathered the whole cohort around Him. They stripped Him and put a scarlet robe on Him, and after twisting some thorns into a crown, they put it on His head. They put a reed in His right hand and knelt before Him and mocked Him, saying, 'Hail, King of the Jews!' They spat on Him, and took the reed and struck Him on the head. After mocking Him, they stripped Him of the robe and put His own clothes on Him. Then they led Him away to crucify Him.

So, in front of the whole crowd of jeering, jibing soldiers, Jesus is stripped, naked and bruised. The level of a human's humiliation has never gone this far before. In their abhorrence of nakedness, they decide to humiliate Jesus by making Him the object of their hate. He, in His nakedness, is the personification of their hatred of everyone and everything. Can this vulnerability become any less acute?

It's almost as if the soldiers are becoming obsessed with the physicality of Jesus, His body, His suffering, taking out their own fear and psychological trauma on Him. Kneeling in front of Him, spitting on Him and so on.

So in this scapegoating of that which they revile and hate within themselves, in this utter terrifying torture, these soldiers are in some way trying to fight off their own demons. They hate the task which they have been ordered to do, they hate the fact that they have been entrusted to do it, but they lose themselves in the violence of it. And according to Matthew, Jesus stands there, says and does nothing. Never before have the words of Isaiah 53 rung so powerfully in the depths of our imagination:

He was oppressed and afflicted, yet He did not open His mouth; He was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is silent, so He did not open His mouth.

Reminded we might be of the dreadfully shocking pictures and stories of abuse of many naked Iraqi prisoners in Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad of a couple of years ago. The sickenly shocking events that took place there compare, one would imagine, to the kind of things to which Jesus would have been subjected. I'm not on an anti-military rant at all, but when human beings come together in situations of tension, war and conflict, then dreadful things can potentially happen. Hugely shocking acts of evil and indecency. Humans can treat other humans like animals, or like pieces of meat, humiliating them to the point of dehumanization in the perpetrators' eyes; using that naked figure as a scapegoat for our own inadequacies and self-hatred.

The trial and mocking of Jesus have largely become sanitized to us, almost sterile when they are read, because we have distance of time and space, of culture and of familiarity. But that is why the liturgy of the passion is so crucial to us. It is through the stark symbolism of the wood of the cross, which we will behold in front of us later this afternoon, that we can understand the costly love and the naked surrender of the Man of Sorrows. And from the height of the cross, Jesus, as Luke records it, pronounces that general absolution for one and for all: 'Father forgive them, for they know not what they are doing'. And in those words, the soldiers are forgiven, Pilate is forgiven, the High Priests are forgiven, the crowds are forgiven, the disciples who fled and deserted Jesus have been forgiven. We have been forgiven. From the lofty wood of the tree with outstretched arms, God forgives us, without exception, without condition and without limitation, temporally, spatially or psychologically.

So if we are in a place in our lives where we are afraid and are bearing some hatred or unresolved resentment in our hearts, then now let us open up to that Man of Sorrows. For in His sacred wounded heart is literally unending love, compassion, forgiveness and mercy. From His naked humiliation, we see the power of a no-blame attitude. We see the power of turning the other cheek and allowing those who perpetrate violence to make the evil fools out of themselves that they are. And yet, somehow, in the mysteriousness of the love of God, they are forgiven.

Address 3 — Reading: John 19:23–27

When the soldiers had crucified Jesus, they took His clothes and divided them into four parts, one for each soldier. They also took His tunic; now the tunic was seamless, woven in one piece from the top. So they said to one another, 'Let us not tear it, but cast lots for it to see who will get it.' This was to fulfil what the scripture says, 'They divided my clothes among themselves, and for my clothing they cast lots.' And that is what the soldiers did.

Meanwhile, standing near the cross of Jesus were His mother, and His mother's sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. When Jesus saw His mother and the disciple whom he loved standing beside her, he said to His mother, 'Woman, here is your son.' Then He said to the disciple, 'Here is your mother.' And from that hour the disciple took her into his own home.

Now we gaze upon that solitary wind-cut and pierced isolated figure, high upon the wood beam, unable to breathe. Yet in His final moments He is still pouring forth love and mercy. Jesus recognized the naked suffering of His mother, losing her son, and the grief of His beloved disciple. Like so many dying people their worry and their pain is for those who are left behind. In the pain of a mother's grief at the unnatural and heartbreaking reality of losing a child, Mary stands beside us, sheltering us from the pain and fear of naked vulnerability. Mary has already seen and experienced the pain of grief, and so in our pain and suffering, whatever individual experience that may be for us, no matter how irrelevant we might perceive it to be, Mary is beside us. It is not irrelevant or trivial to her, nor is it to God.

The symbolism of the tearing of the garments of Jesus and the bartering over who would get the seamless tunic is never greater if we think about our own nakedness and vulnerability. By now we have cast off our own veneer, we have put away the layers of clothing which prevent us from loving whom we see each day in the mirror and which prevent us from being loved as we truly are, not as we might want others to see us. If we have done so, then the thought of someone else jeering over what we have cast off is so tortuous and embarrassing. We want a hole to swallow us up. We cannot possibly carry on in this life with pride and psychological barrier exposed and plainly visible. But it's too late. Our beautiful tunic has gone and we leave it behind. We avert our gaze from ourselves and our own worries towards the Cross — and we see in that figure the balm to our worried hearts, the answer to our deep-seated questions and the security to our most profound insecurities.

In our yearning for meaning and sense and some kind of reconciliation to the complexities of life, psychology, our mental stability, our awareness of ourselves and others, our highs and lows, we cannot help but be magnetically fixed on the Cross. And so our eyes must remain there for the moment, until God's mysterious process has been completed. We must be patient, live with the nakedness, live with freezing cold vulnerability, the discomfort, the pain, because the light is slowly beginning to pierce through, somewhere in the distance. We hang on in there, looking for something — surely Jesus cannot just die without something happening? Surely this is not the end ...

The 20th century Catholic theologian Henri de Lubac reflects on the fact that before our unity and our wholeness and our joy can be achieved, we must first allow our nakedness to be exposed. Our own light must first be dimmed by the shadow of the Cross:

'However genuine and unsullied the vision of unity that inspires and directs mankind's activity, to become effective it must first be dimmed. It must be enveloped in the great shadow of the Cross. [...] Through Christ dying on the Cross, the humanity which He bore whole and entire in His own Person renounces itself and dies. But the mystery is deeper still. He who bore all men in Himself was deserted by all. The universal Man died alone. This is the consummation of the Kenosis and the perfection of sacrifice. The desertion — even an abandonment by the mystery of solitude and the mystery of severance, the only efficacious sign of gathering together and of unity: the sacred blade piercing so deep as to separate soul from spirit, but only that universal life might enter. "O You who are solitary among the solitary, and all in all." "By the wood of the Cross", concludes St Irenaeus, "the work of the Word of God was made manifest to all: His hands are stretched out to gather all men together. Two hands outstretched, for there are two peoples scattered over the whole earth. One sole head in the midst, for there is but one God over all, among all and in all."'1

1de Lubac, Henri (trans.), Catholicism: Christ and the Common destiny of Man, Ignatius Press (1950), pp367-369.